El año pasado, la gran popularidad del Samsung Galaxy A55 nos hizo preguntarnos si su sucesor, el Samsung Galaxy A56, también se asegurará un puesto destacado en nuestra prestigiosa lista de los mejores smartphones económicos. La respuesta, como revela minuciosamente el análisis, reside en un análisis exhaustivo de sus características, rendimiento y propuesta de valor.
El Samsung Galaxy A56 presenta una atractiva gama de capacidades fotográficas, encabezada por una cámara principal de 50 MP f/1.8 con un sensor de 1/1.56", enfoque automático por detección de fase (PDAF) y estabilización óptica de imagen (OIS). Esto se complementa con una cámara ultra gran angular de 12 MP f/2.2 con un sensor de 1/3.06" y una cámara macro de 5 MP f/2.4 para primeros planos. Para selfies, el dispositivo cuenta con una cámara frontal de 12 MP f/2.2 sin enfoque automático. La capacidad de grabación de video alcanza una resolución 4K a 30 fotogramas por segundo .
La experiencia visual se ofrece a través de una pantalla Super AMOLED de 6,7 pulgadas con una resolución de 2340 x 1080 píxeles , que alcanza un impresionante brillo máximo de 1900 nits y está protegida por Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ . El dispositivo cuenta con una batería de 5000 mAh con carga rápida, aunque no incluye carga inalámbrica.
En cuanto al software, el Galaxy A56 funciona con Android 15 y está previsto que reciba hasta seis actualizaciones importantes del sistema operativo , lo que garantiza su longevidad y un soporte de software continuo.
Con un precio de £499 para el modelo con 256 GB de almacenamiento interno , el A56 se posiciona como una opción muy competitiva frente a sus rivales más cercanos. Compite directamente con el iPhone 16e (desde $599/£599 para la versión de 128 GB, y hasta $699/£699 para la de 256 GB) y el Google Pixel 9a (con un precio similar de $499/£499 para la versión de 128 GB, y $599/£599 para la de 256 GB).
Las impresiones iniciales sugieren una sólida propuesta de valor, lo que impulsa una exploración más profunda de las características y capacidades adicionales que se ofrecen por el precio.
El arsenal fotográfico del Samsung A56 es notable, con una configuración de triple lente . Esta configuración supera en número al sistema de lente única del iPhone 16e y al de doble lente del Pixel 9a. Si bien la inclusión de una tercera lente proporciona una ventaja numérica sobre el iPhone 16e, es crucial reconocer que esta tercera lente es una lente macro de menor resolución , cuyo rendimiento a menudo no cumple con las expectativas.
La cámara principal de 50 MP f/1.8 destaca como una opción respetable en el segmento de precio medio, compitiendo eficazmente con las cámaras principales del iPhone 16e y el Pixel 9a. Está acompañada por un lente ultra gran angular de 12 MP f/2.2 , que ofrece una perspectiva más amplia que la del iPhone 16e (que carece de ultra gran angular) y se queda ligeramente por detrás del ultra gran angular de 13 MP f/2.2 del Pixel 9a (una diferencia mínima que probablemente no tenga un impacto significativo en el mundo real).
El objetivo macro de 5 MP presenta una característica peculiar. Si bien permite tomar fotografías de cerca, su menor resolución, sensor más pequeño y apertura más estrecha podrían limitar su efectividad general. Este objetivo ocupa el espacio que podría encontrarse en otros modelos con un teleobjetivo (aunque los teleobjetivos son escasos a este precio), lo que significa que quienes buscan zoom óptico deberán recurrir al zoom digital , que ofrece un aumento de hasta 10x.
En la parte frontal del dispositivo, la cámara selfie de 12 MP f/2.2 cumple con las especificaciones estándar de los smartphones de gama media e incluso de algunos de gama alta de fabricantes como Samsung y Apple. Se nota la ausencia de autoenfoque (AF), algo habitual incluso en muchos dispositivos insignia.
Considerando la gran popularidad de su predecesor, el Galaxy A55, la reseña aborda las innovaciones clave introducidas en el A56. Si bien las especificaciones de la cámara parecen en gran medida idénticas (o al menos comparten las mismas resoluciones y configuración de triple lente), las principales distinciones radican en el diseño del cuerpo . El A56 presume de un perfil ligeramente más ligero y delgado en comparación con el A55, a pesar de contar con un cuerpo y una pantalla ligeramente más grandes (6,7 pulgadas frente a 6,6 pulgadas). Ambos dispositivos comparten la misma resolución de pantalla y protección Gorilla Glass Victus+, pero el nuevo A56 ofrece un brillo significativamente mejorado, alcanzando un pico de 1900 nits en comparación con los 1000 nits del A55. La reseña sugiere que los usuarios actuales del A55 podrían encontrar pocas razones convincentes para actualizar, pero para aquellos que hacen la transición de modelos más antiguos o diferentes, el A56 representa una opción superior.
The review methodology emphasizes evaluating smartphones from a photographic and camera performance perspective. This involves athorough assessment of the phone's photographic and video features, with particular attention paid to the output quality from each lens, photoediting capabilities, and the overall performance of the camera system.Additional factors such as screen quality and battery life are alsoconsidered integral to the overall user experience.
The review highlights that the differences between thepreceding A55 model and the latest A56 iteration are not substantial.The A56 features a slightly larger display (6.7 inches versus 6.6inches), but both utilize Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ and possess anIP67 rating for water and dust resistance. Despite its larger screen,the A56 is marginally lighter.
In terms of camera hardware, both models employ a triple-lens setup comprising a 50MP f/1.8 primary camera, a 12MP f/2.2 ultrawide lens, and a 5MP f/2.4 macro camera. Interestingly, the selfie camera resolution on the A56 has been reduced from 32MP to 12MP.
Another notable omission in the A56 is the MicroSD card slot, a feature present in the A55. However, the A56 introduces improvements such as faster charging capabilities and a faster processor.
The review concludes that for existing A55 owners, theupgrade to the A56 might not be compelling, and they might even consider seeking out deals on the older model, especially if a memory card slotis a priority. In some aspects, the A56 is characterized as a potentialdowngrade for users who value expandable storage.
Compared to competitors in its price range, such as the iPhone 16e and the Google Pixel 9a, the Samsung Galaxy A56 boasts a large 6.7-inch screen, placing it in the realm of some flagship models, a significantadvantage at a mid-range price point. Furthermore, the inclusion of Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ is impressive and should provide robust protection against scratches and scrapes. The screen's peak brightness of 1900 nits is commendable for its class, contributing to good visibility andvibrant display of photos and videos with seemingly accurate colorreproduction.
The A56 features IP67 water and dust proofing. While not as robust as the IP68 rating found on the iPhone 16e, itstill offers substantial protection, capable of withstanding submersionin up to one meter of water for 30 minutes, providing ample resilienceagainst accidental spills or exposure to rain.
Aesthetically, the A56 is described as somewhat understated, a common characteristic in this price segment. The review unit was the"Graphite" color, with "Pink" and "Olive" options offering more vibrantalternatives. The phone features rounded corners and a flat screen,exhibiting a design reminiscent of iPhones, a matter of personalpreference. A small cutout for the selfie camera contributes to a goodscreen-to-body ratio, although the bezels are noted as being fairlyprominent.
The rear camera arrangement consists of three lenses alignedvertically, a design deemed unexciting but typical for major brands like Apple, Samsung, and Google, contrasting with the more distinctivedesigns often adopted by cheaper Chinese manufacturers such as Xiaomi,Tecno, or Oppo.
For a mid-range smartphone, the A56 offers a good selection of different shooting modes within its native camera application, a common expectation for Android models in this price bracket.
The standard "Photo" mode provides access to the 0.5x and 1x lenses, along with quick tap options for 2x, 4x, andthe maximum 10x digital zoom. Pinch-to-zoom functionality is alsoavailable.
In low-light conditions, a Night mode is designed to activate automatically, but users can also manually select it from the "More" tab. The A56's third lens is a macro lens, activated either by the phone suggesting macro mode when close to a subject or by manual selection from the "More" tab.
Additional options within the "Photo" setting includeapplying digital filters, choosing to shoot at the full 50MP resolution(with the 1x lens), toggling the flash, and adjusting the aspect ratio.Exposure compensation is also adjustable in this mode. Further settings, accessible via a cog icon, allow users to toggle the "Scene Optimiser"(which automatically adjusts colors), add watermarks, and change thefile format of captured images.
Other shooting modes within the native camera app include Portrait mode, offering 1x or 2x shooting options, adjustable blur effects, and aspect ratio changes. A Pro mode is also available, enabling manual adjustments of ISO, white balance,exposure compensation, metering, and shutter speed, although RAW format shooting is not supported.
For video recording, the "Video" mode offers resolutions up to 4K at 30fps, with an option to enable "Super Steady" image stabilization (limited to 1080p at 30fps). Additional video modes such as Pro Video, Slow Motion, and Hyperlapse can be found under the "More" tab.
Reflecting a growing trend, the A56 incorporates a suite of AI editing tools, including options to erase shadows, reflections, and other objectswithin the frame. This functionality is described as useful for quickand simple edits, performing well with uncomplicated backgrounds andsubjects, provided the finished results are not scrutinized too closely.
The review asserts that the A56 is capable of producing lovely imagery with overall detailed shots and pleasing colors. However, it notes that there doesn't appear to be a significant leap in image quality compared to its predecessor.
As anticipated, the best results are achieved with the 1x primary lens. Images are typically output at 12MP, with an option to shoot at thefull 50MP resolution. The 12MP images exhibit a good level of detail,particularly in well-lit conditions.
Color reproduction is described as very bright, a characteristic often associated with Samsung devices. The A56generally produces more vivid results compared to similarly pricedmodels like the Google Pixel 9a and the iPhone 16e. The preferred colorrendition is subjective, with some users appreciating the bold lookwhile others might favor a more muted and realistic aesthetic.
The ultrawide lens performs adequately, butthere is a noticeable drop in image quality compared to the main 1x lens when viewing images on a large screen. The reviewer suggests that thismight not be a frequent use case, as the images appear very good on theA56's own screen and would likely be suitable for social media display.
The absence of a telephoto lens means that zooming relies on digital magnification up to 10x. The review suggests that only the 2x digital zoom produces reasonably good results, with significant smudging and loss of detail becoming apparent at 4x and beyond, making it a less desirableoption unless absolutely necessary.
The 5MP macro lens, in place of a telephoto, yields results that are described as "OK," but the reviewer suggeststhat better results can often be achieved by simply shooting with the 1x lens. For personal use, the macro option is deemed likely to be rarelyutilized, with a preference expressed for a dedicated telephoto lens.The review suggests that users sharing this preference might considerthe Samsung Galaxy S24 FE.
Portrait images are generally well-rendered, particularly with uncluttered backgrounds and subjects with relativelysmooth outlines. Close scrutiny might reveal some outlining artifactsaround the subject, but they appear pleasing on an average phone screen.
The selfie camera also performs decently despite its relatively lower resolution, offering the ability to apply a blurred background effect.
In low-light conditions, the 1x primary lens produces some usable results with a good amount of detail retention and well-balanced highlights and shadows. The ultrawide lens's performancedeteriorates significantly in low light, making it less reliable in such conditions. As expected, any zoom beyond 1x relies on digitalmagnification, with even 2x showing a noticeable lack of detail.
The initial price of the A56 might seem relatively highcompared to its predecessor, the A55. However, the review notes that the A55's price has significantly decreased since its launch, where itsoriginal recommended retail price (RRP) was very close to the A56'scurrent RRP. At launch, the A55 was priced at £439 for the 128GB version and £489 for the 256GB version, only £10 cheaper than the A56's sole256GB offering (£499).
Currently, the A55 can be acquired for around £250-£350,depending on the desired storage capacity. Given the identical camerahardware and similar design, potential buyers might prefer the A55 atits current lower price point rather than waiting for the A56 to undergo a similar price reduction.
The review also draws attention to the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE as a competitor within Samsung's own lineup. While slightly moreexpensive (starting at £549 for 128GB, up to £599 for 256GB), the S24 FE offers a superior screen (AMOLED versus OLED, although size andbrightness are similar) and a more versatile 8MP telephoto lens compared to the A56's macro lens.
Compared to mid-range models from other brands, the A56 is deemed to offer good value. It is priced lower than its nearest Android competitor with equivalentstorage, as the £499 asking price for the A56 with 256GB of storage only buys a Google Pixel 9a with 128GB of storage; the 256GB Pixel 9a costsan additional £100. The A56 is also significantly cheaper than the overpriced iPhone 16e, which is likely to maintain its higher price point. The iPhone 16ecosts £599 for the 128GB version and a substantial £699 for the 256GBvariant, a full £200 more than the A56, while offering only a third ofthe number of camera lenses and a much smaller screen.
At the time of writing, the A56 is not yet available forpurchase in the US. The preceding A55 was also not released in the US,reportedly due to Samsung's strategy to avoid cannibalizing sales of its other budget-friendly models, notably the S23 FE. While the S24 FEdirectly competes with the A56, the A56 is expected to make its debut in the US market at a later date, providing more options for consumers.
La categoría de teléfonos inteligentes económicos actualmente es muycompetitiva, con modelos como el A56 que demuestran que se puede lograrun rendimiento excelente sin superar el umbral de precio de $1000/£1000.
En general, la A56 produce imágenes de buena calidad caracterizadas por colores intensos y vibrantes, con el objetivoprincipal 1x capturando un nivel de detalle admirable. El objetivo ultra gran angular, aunque no tan potente como el principal, ofreceresultados satisfactorios. El objetivo macro se considera menos útil,posiblemente incluido principalmente con fines de marketing paradestacar un sistema de triple lente en comparación con la competenciacon menos objetivos.
El Samsung Galaxy A56 destaca como uno de los teléfonos de gama media con mejor precio del mercado , superando al iPhone 16e y al Google Pixel 9a en capacidad dealmacenamiento equivalente. Sin embargo, se reconoce que el A56 norepresenta una mejora significativa respecto a su predecesor. Serecomienda a los propietarios del A55 que conserven su dispositivoactual o consideren buscar ofertas en el modelo anterior mientras aúnesté disponible.
En conclusión, el A56 se presenta como una excelente opción por varias razones, principalmente su atractivo precio . Para quienes actualicen modelos anteriores o diferentes, sin dudaofrecerá una mejora. Sin embargo, a quienes prioricen un buenteleobjetivo y tengan flexibilidad presupuestaria, se recomiendaconsiderar el Samsung Galaxy S24 FE o, posiblemente, el Oppo Reno 13 Pro si la fidelidad a la marca Samsung no es una preocupación principal.
